Journal Article22 June 2026 Tina Austin, Jason Gulya, NICK Potkalitsky
Metacognition is often presented as a response to generative AI’s disruption of
teaching and learning, yet the term has become too generalized to guide
practice. In AI-mediated environments, asking students merely to “reflect on
your thinking” is insufficient. Because AI tools can redistribute cognitive
labor, their educational value depends on how students use them and whether that
use supports disciplinary forms of reasoning. This essay argues that
metacognition must be understood as disciplinary infrastructure: students cannot
effectively monitor their thinking without understanding the epistemological and
ontological demands of the field in which they are working. Classrooms therefore
become sites where student frameworks interact with more discipline-grounded
instructional frameworks. Teachers must balance immersion and friction, enabling
students to enter the flow of inquiry while introducing strategic pauses that
make disciplinary expectations visible. Tina Austin’s UnBlooms Framework offers
one model through “metacognitive checkpoints,” where students evaluate whether
AI is helping or hindering their learning. These checkpoints ask students to
discern when AI supports a discipline-responsive habit of mind and when they
should resist offloading and complete a task themselves. The essay reframes
metacognition as concrete, discipline-sensitive, and grounded in judgment within
AI-mediated learning.
A link to a video related to this presentation can be found below in the
Additional Files section.