Research Highlights
-
The Problem: Legal education programs primarily focus on traditional doctrinal study and theoretical reasoning, which fails to prepare graduates for a legal profession increasingly mediated by artificial intelligence (AI) tools and automated workflows.
-
The Method: Researchers conducted an exploratory scan of publicly available law school curricula and a narrative review of contemporary scholarship from databases including Google Scholar and Westlaw to identify gaps between educational offerings and professional demands.
-
Quantitative Finding: 55% of 29 surveyed law schools offer courses dedicated to AI; 83% provide experiential AI opportunities; 69% updated academic integrity policies for generative AI; only 9% of students reported taking a course on legal technology.
-
Qualitative Finding: AI integration remains uneven across institutions with declining faculty support for AI-focused classes; students express ambivalence and a lack of structured institutional roadmaps despite utilizing tools like ChatGPT; ethical risks include "hallucinations" or fabricated legal authorities as seen in cases like Mata v. Avianca and Shahid v. Esaam.
-
Finding: To produce practice-ready lawyers, institutions must integrate AI literacy, technical competence, and ethical instruction into core curricula through experiential learning, interdisciplinary collaboration, and AI-driven simulations.
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly transforming the practice of law, from predictive analytics in policing and algorithmic sentencing to generative AI-assisted drafting and research. Despite this technological shift, legal education remains predominantly doctrinal, inadequately preparing graduates to function effectively in an AI-mediated environment. This paper contends that law and legal studies programs must integrate AI literacy, applied AI skills, and ethical instruction into curricula. By leveraging experiential learning, interdisciplinary collaboration, AI-driven simulations, and critical inquiry, institutions can produce graduates who are both technically competent and ethically grounded, ready to navigate the evolving legal profession.
Recommended Citation
Awa, Peculiar and Shostak, Grant
(2026)
"Harnessing AI in Legal Education: Opportunities for Innovation, Leadership, and Student Success,"
Journal of Educational Leadership in Action: Vol. 10:
Iss.
2, Article 6.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62608/2164-1102.1223
Available at:
https://digitalcommons.lindenwood.edu/ela/vol10/iss2/6
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
Included in
Curriculum and Instruction Commons, Educational Administration and Supervision Commons, Educational Assessment, Evaluation, and Research Commons, Legal Education Commons