Date of Award
9-1979
Document Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Master of Arts
Department
Psychology
First Advisor
Gary Faltico
Second Advisor
Boyd Morros
Abstract
-
The Problem: The author addresses the lack of systematic guidance for laypersons in selecting a psychotherapy model that aligns with their individual lifestyle, personality, and values.
-
The Method: The study utilizes a comparative analysis of Moral, Illness, Psychoanalytic, Behavioral/Learning, and Existential/Humanistic perspectives, incorporating literature from theorists like Freud, Rogers, and Wolpe alongside practicum experience at the Hypnosis Motivation Institute and the Growth Art Therapy Program.
-
Qualitative Finding: The analysis determines that effective therapy depends on the compatibility between the client's personal characteristics and the therapist's theoretical orientation, as evidenced by the author's observation that theoretically conflicting therapies can both be effective.
-
The Outcome: The thesis provides a decision-making framework and "Which Therapy?" guide to help clients differentiate among therapies based on specific goals like symptom removal, character restructuring, or self-actualization.
Recommended Citation
Shaw, David, "Which Therapy?: An Analysis of Value Judgments in Psychotherapy" (1979). Theses. 1678.
https://digitalcommons.lindenwood.edu/theses/1678
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.