Student Scholarship

Document Type

Research Paper

Abstract

This thesis, written in 1967, examines the development and operational structure of the Democratic Study Group, a formal organization of liberal Democrats within the United States House of Representatives. The group emerged in response to the perceived inefficiency of the Democratic Party's numerical majority, which was frequently stymied by a conservative coalition of Southern Democrats and Republicans who controlled key legislative instruments like the Rules Committee. Officially established in September 1959, the Democratic Study Group sought to provide a cohesive voice for junior, issue-oriented members from contested districts who felt marginalized by the traditional power-oriented leadership. 

The document details the group's primary internal mechanisms: a sophisticated whip system and a dedicated research function. The whip system was designed to ensure liberal attendance for crucial teller votes in the Committee of the Whole, where legislation was often won or lost before reaching a formal roll call. This system utilized a pyramid communication structure that could alert all members within thirteen minutes. Simultaneously, the research arm provided fact sheets and legislative summaries to keep members informed on complex issues outside their own committee assignments, effectively countering the information advantage held by senior committee chairmen. 

While the Democratic Study Group positioned itself as a supporter of the national Democratic platform and the Kennedy-Johnson administrations, the thesis notes a complex relationship with House leadership. The group’s activities, such as independent polling on civil rights and the creation of its own campaign committee, occasionally drew the ire of party leaders. Ultimately, the author concludes that the group served as a necessary counterbalance to conservative influence, though its long-term necessity remained tied to the resolution of the North-South party split and the progress of civil rights legislation.

Research Highlights

The Problem: The Democratic Party in the House of Representatives during the late 1950s and early 1960s was split between a conservative Southern faction and a liberal faction, with the former often aligning with Republicans to block liberal legislation. 

The Method: This thesis analyzes the formation, organizational structure, and legislative tactics of the Democratic Study Group (DSG) through interviews with Staff Director William Phillips and other Congressional staff, as well as a questionnaire distributed to liberal House members. 

Qualitative Finding: The DSG established a sophisticated, multi-tiered whip system capable of delivering messages to 125 members within thirteen minutes; the group's primary functions shifted from initiating legislation under Republican administrations to supporting and refining the executive program under Democratic leadership. 

Quantitative Finding: In 1959, the DSG formed officially after a September 4 invitation letter; by 1960, the group helped defeat the conservative coalition on 12 of 19 key roll call votes; in 1963, the House was divided among approximately 156 liberal Democrats (125 in the DSG), 100 Southern Democrats, and 177 Republicans.

Publication Date

1-1964

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Faculty Sponsor

Archive

Download

Share

COinS