Date of Award
4-1983
Document Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Master of Science, Management
Department
Business
First Advisor
Russell Johnson
Second Advisor
Patrick Land
Abstract
H.D. Simpkin's Paired Comparisons and Personnel Compensation: A Computer-Aided Approach explores the use of the paired comparison method in employee performance evaluation and salary determination. The study examines the challenges human resource managers face in linking salary increases with performance assessments, emphasizing the limitations of traditional ranking and rating systems. The paired comparison method, which systematically compares employees against each other in pairs, is proposed as a more reliable and objective alternative.
The thesis details a study conducted with laboratory technicians, where supervisors used both conventional ranking methods and a computerized paired comparison system. Statistical analysis demonstrated a high correlation between the two ranking methods, validating the reliability of paired comparisons. The introduction of a digital computer to automate the process significantly reduced the time required for evaluations, improved consistency, and minimized common rating biases.
Simpkin argues that paired comparisons, when properly implemented, can enhance merit-based compensation systems, ensuring fair and legally defensible salary adjustments. The study highlights the potential of computer-aided evaluation tools in modern HR management, making performance-based compensation more efficient and equitable. Ultimately, the research supports the integration of digital decision-making tools to improve traditional employee assessment methodologies.
Recommended Citation
Simpkin, H. D., "Paired Comparisons and Personal Compensation: A Computer-Aided Approach" (1983). Theses. 1302.
https://digitalcommons.lindenwood.edu/theses/1302
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International License.
