Student Scholarship

Document Type

Research Paper

Abstract

This study examines the license renewal policy of the Federal Communications Commission as it existed in 1957, focusing on the historical development of broadcasting regulations and the practical application of the public interest standard. The history of radio regulation in the United States began with the Wireless Ship Act of 1910 and evolved through the Radio Act of 1912. Following a period of chaos and interference in the mid-1920s known as bedlam, Congress established the Federal Radio Commission via the Radio Act of 1927. This authority was later centralized under the Federal Communications Commission through the Communications Act of 1934, which remains the primary legislative framework for regulating interstate and foreign communication. 

The core of the license renewal process is the test of public interest, convenience, and necessity. While early renewals were often automatic, the 1946 publication of the Blue Book signaled a shift toward more detailed reviews of station performance. The Commission evaluates renewal applications through a rigorous multi-branch process involving engineering, financial, and legal reviews. Although the Commission is prohibited from exercising direct censorship, it maintains the authority to review program balance and composition to ensure stations meet their obligations to the community. 

Case studies of renewal hearings illustrate that the Commission prioritizes service to the community over technical or reporting violations. Key areas of scrutiny include excessive commercialism, fraudulent advertising, and the proper handling of political broadcasts under Section 315 of the Act. In instances of repeated or willful violations, such as the Carlson case in New Orleans, the Commission has exercised its power to deny renewal and grant the frequency to a more qualified applicant. Ultimately, the license renewal policy serves as a flexible instrument to ensure the American broadcasting system remains a functional instrument of democracy.

Research Highlights

  • The Problem: This study examines the license renewal policy of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to determine how the "public interest, convenience, and necessity" standard is applied in practice. 

  • The Method: The researcher utilized FCC records and historical analysis of federal regulation, including case studies of specific renewal hearings involving issues like overcommercialism, fraudulent advertising, and political censorship. 

  • Quantitative Finding: In 1955, the FCC questioned 21 station applications regarding program balance; during a 1946 investigation of station KMAC, the commission found 64% of broadcast time was commercial; station WJBW received 92 notices of violation in a single three-year license period. 

  • Qualitative Finding: The FCC prioritizes community service over strict technical compliance, often granting renewals if a station provides unique local value; the "Blue Book" policy of 1946 established a shift toward a more detailed review of station performance; the commission maintains that while it cannot censor, it has the authority to determine the "composition" of broadcast traffic. 

Publication Date

1-1957

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Faculty Sponsor

Archive

Download

Share

COinS