Student Scholarship

Document Type

Research Paper

Abstract

This project explores the intense debate surrounding the potential introduction of subscription television in the United States during the mid-1950s. At the time of writing, the Federal Communications Commission was considering Docket No. 11279, a massive collection of arguments from proponents like Zenith and Skiatron, and opponents led by major networks and theater owners. The central conflict rests on whether pay television represents a revolutionary expansion of cultural and educational opportunities or a threat to the established system of free, advertiser-supported broadcasting. 

A primary legal question is whether subscription television qualifies as broadcasting under the Communications Act of 1934. Opponents argue it is narrowcasting designed for a privileged few, while proponents point to precedents like Muzak to suggest that direct payment does not disqualify a service from being considered in the public interest. Economically, the document examines the fear that pay-TV’s massive revenue potential would allow it to outbid free television for top talent and popular programming, such as the World Series or Hollywood films. 

The proponents argue that subscription television would actually supplement free programming by providing content that advertisers cannot afford, such as first-run movies, grand opera, and niche educational films. Conversely, critics warn that once a mass audience is established, the system would inevitably siphon away the very programs currently enjoyed for free, eventually forcing sponsors to withdraw as audiences dwindle. The author concludes that there is no immediate need for subscription television, suggesting that the burgeoning free television industry will eventually be capable of offering the same high-quality content without imposing a direct fee on the American public.

Research Highlights

  • The Problem: The researcher evaluates the economic and social viability of subscription television (Pay-TV) and its potential impact on the existing advertiser-sponsored free television system in the United States. 

  • The Method: The project utilizes a comparative analysis of arguments submitted to the FCC in Docket No. 11279, incorporating data from three pay-TV proponents (Zenith, Paramount, Skiatron), network opposers (CBS, NBC, ABC), and public opinion polls. 

  • Quantitative Finding: In 1954, a sponsor paid $1,000,000 for World Series rights, while pay-TV could gross $25,000,000 for the same event; 40% of viewers surveyed would pay for the World Series; "lower" and "lower-middle" families account for 41% of television homes; Telemeter forecasts pay-TV revenues exceeding $5 billion in 1960 and $6 billion in 1965. 

  • Qualitative Finding: Proponents argue that a "box office" system allows for high-cost "top-flight" talent, first-run motion pictures, and specialized cultural programming like opera; opponents claim the system is "narrowcasting" that will siphon popular talent and programs from free television, creating a discriminatory class system based on the ability to pay. 

  • Finding: The researcher concludes that subscription television is unnecessary because the burgeoning free television industry has the potential to eventually offer the same quality of programming without a fee.

Publication Date

1-1956

Faculty Sponsor

Archive

Download

Included in

Television Commons

Share

COinS