Student Scholarship

Document Type

Research Paper

Abstract

This academic study provides a detailed examination of the Washington Bureau of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, with a specific focus on its methodologies for covering the United States Senate. Established as a national presence in 1918 under Charles G. Ross, the bureau operates under a strict policy platform originally conceived by Joseph Pulitzer in 1907. This platform mandates a commitment to progress, reform, and independence, specifically enjoining the staff to never be satisfied with merely printing the news but to actively fight corruption and injustice. At the time of the study, the seven-man bureau was led by Raymond P. Brandt and comprised specialized correspondents who prioritized stories with a St. Louis angle while maintaining a crusading approach to journalism. 

The document outlines the rigorous professional environment of the Washington Press Corps, including the specific rules of the Standing Committee of Correspondents that govern access to the congressional press galleries. Arrington describes the logistical challenges faced by reporters in the Senate gallery, such as poor acoustics and the high-pressure demand for running accounts of legislative proceedings. A central component of the paper is a comparative analysis of how the St. Louis Post-Dispatch and the Chicago Daily Tribune reported on the 1954 McCarthy censure. Through an evaluation of headlines, story placement, and editorial tone, Arrington demonstrates how each publication slanted its coverage to reflect its respective political leanings and institutional policies. Ultimately, the study concludes that the Post-Dispatch staff is driven by an innate force for integrity and public service, upholding a legacy of thorough and reliable reporting that distinguishes it within the American media landscape.

Publication Date

1-1955

Faculty Sponsor

Archive

Download

Share

COinS