Student Scholarship

Document Type

Research Paper

Abstract

This paper examines the impact and effectiveness of the Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 with a specific focus on the professional staffing of congressional committees. Writing in 1953, the author evaluates whether the transition from a patronage-based system to a merit-based professional staff has successfully helped Congress regain its legislative authority relative to the executive branch. The study utilizes interviews with prominent figures such as Senator Mike Monroney and Dr. George Galloway to provide a contemporary assessment of these reforms. 

The analysis reveals that while the act streamlined the committee structure by reducing the number of standing committees, its implementation has been only partially successful. Estimates suggest the legislation is roughly fifty percent effective, largely due to the persistence of the seniority system. Under this traditional rule, committee chairmen often retain significant control over staff appointments, sometimes utilizing professional positions as political patronage rather than hiring strictly on a merit basis. This has led to a lack of tenure security and occasional turnovers driven by political shifts rather than professional incompetence. 

Despite these shortcomings, the author concludes that the addition of professional staff has significantly improved the quality of legislative work. These experts provide essential technical knowledge that allows Congressmen to form independent policies and exercise better oversight of the federal bureaucracy. The shift toward a modern merit system is described as a period of transition that has successfully arrested the decline of legislative power. Ultimately, the paper suggests that while further reforms to the seniority system and fiscal research capabilities are necessary, the professionalization of congressional staff remains a vital component of maintaining representative government in a complex, technical age.

Research Highlights

  • The Problem: The author examines whether the 1946 reorganization of Congressional committees and the introduction of professional staffs successfully countered the centralization of authority in the executive branch or shifted governance toward unelected experts. 

  • The Method: This study utilizes interviews with Senator A. S. Mike Monroney, Representatives Carl Albert and Tom Steed, and Dr. George B. Galloway, alongside an analysis of staffing data and committee activities from the 80th and 81st Congresses. 

  • Quantitative Finding: The Legislative Reorganization Act of 1946 was estimated to be only 50% operative by its co-author; professional staffs were 75% operative with a 25% turnover rate during transitions; 67.6% of 34 standing committees conformed to the act’s spirit in staffing. 

  • Qualitative Finding: Professional staffing arrested the trend of executive domination by providing technical expertise to Congress; committee chairmen often utilized staff appointments as patronage tools; seniority remains a primary obstacle to merit-based selection and efficient fiscal oversight. 

Publication Date

1-1953

Faculty Sponsor

Archive

Download

Share

COinS