Student Scholarship

Document Type

Research Paper

Abstract

This research project, submitted in January 1966, examines the historical, legal, and political complexities surrounding presidential succession and inability in the United States. The author argues that the constitutional provisions regarding these issues were filled with dangerous ambiguities and omissions that necessitated a formal amendment to prevent national chaos during times of crisis. The study traces the evolution of succession laws from the initial intent of the Framers through the various Succession Acts of 1792, 1886, and 1947. It highlights how political expediency and partisan maneuvers often dictated the line of succession, such as the effort to prevent Thomas Jefferson from succeeding to the presidency. 

The author provides a detailed analysis of historical precedents, focusing on the eight presidents who died in office and three notable instances of presidential inability involving James Garfield, Woodrow Wilson, and Dwight Eisenhower. The project emphasizes the significance of the Tyler Precedent of 1841, which established that a Vice President becomes the actual President rather than merely an acting official upon the death of the incumbent. However, this precedent created a dilemma for cases of inability, as Vice Presidents feared that assuming power might permanently displace a recovering President. 

The core of the research details the legislative journey of Senate Joint Resolution 1, which became the proposed Twenty-fifth Amendment. The author documents the collaborative efforts of Senator Birch Bayh, Representative Emanuel Celler, and the American Bar Association to forge a consensus on specific procedures for filling vice presidential vacancies and determining presidential disability. Despite public apathy and minor congressional opposition, the amendment successfully passed both houses in 1965. The project concludes that while the amendment relies on the basic honesty of public officials, it provides a vital, nonpartisan framework to ensure the continuous and stable operation of the executive branch.

Research Highlights

  • The Problem: The United States Constitution and existing statutes (Acts of 1792, 1886, and 1947) contain significant ambiguities regarding the definition of presidential "inability" and the specific mechanics for the Vice President to temporarily assume and subsequently relinquish power. 

  • The Method: This research analyzes historical precedents of succession and inability (Tyler, Garfield, Wilson, and Eisenhower), evaluates congressional hearings and debates from 1955 to 1965, and utilizes primary interviews with key legal counsels from the Senate and House Judiciary Committees. 

  • Qualitative Finding: The successful passage of S. J. Res. 1 was driven by a nonpartisan consensus among the American Bar Association, the Committee for Economic Development, and congressional sponsors following the 1963 Kennedy assassination; the resulting amendment establishes a definitive mechanism for the President to declare their own inability or for the Vice President and Cabinet to initiate such a declaration. 

  • Quantitative Finding: As of November 1965, 12 states including Wisconsin and Nebraska had ratified the proposed 25th Amendment; the 1947 Succession Act established a line of 7 successors; the 25th Amendment requires a two-thirds vote in both Houses of Congress to overrule a presidential declaration of fitness within a 21-day period. 

  • Finding: A constitutional amendment is determined to be the only pragmatically and legally durable solution to preclude constitutional attacks during a national crisis, as informal bilateral agreements between Presidents and Vice Presidents lack the force of law. 

Publication Date

1-1966

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Faculty Sponsor

Archive

Download

Share

COinS