Student Scholarship

Document Type

Research Paper

Abstract

This research project, submitted in January 1966, examines the burgeoning regulatory controversy surrounding Community Antenna Television, or CATV. Originally developed as a technical supplement to improve television reception in rural or obstructed areas, CATV evolved into a significant market force that challenged the traditional broadcasting structure. The author explores the multifaceted impact of CATV on the industry, noting its potential to both hinder the development of local UHF and VHF stations through audience fragmentation and benefit the public by providing clearer signals and greater program variety. A central theme of the study is the jurisdictional vacuum regarding CATV oversight. While some state and local governments attempted to regulate CATV as a public utility, the industry argued that it was a private business and that the federal government had already preempted the field through the Communications Act of 1934. 

The document details the shifting stance of the Federal Communications Commission, which initially declined jurisdiction over CATV but eventually asserted authority indirectly by licensing the microwave relay stations that fed signals to cable operations. The landmark Carter Mountain Case is analyzed as a turning point where the FCC began considering the economic impact of CATV on local broadcasters when granting microwave licenses. Despite these administrative moves, the author argues that the Federal Communications Commission lacked explicit statutory power to regulate all CATV systems. The CATV industry itself, represented by the National Community Television Association, resisted state-level utility regulation and criticized the Federal Communications Commission for making rules without adequate fact-finding or specific Congressional delegation. The study concludes that the most feasible solution to the ongoing controversy is for Congress to enact specific legislation amending the Communications Act. Such a modification would establish clear, national policy goals and define the extent of Federal Communications Commission authority, ensuring that the public interest is served while providing necessary legal stability for both cable operators and traditional broadcasters.

Research Highlights

The Problem: The regulatory status of Community Antenna Television (CATV) in 1966 was characterized by conflicting opinions regarding whether it should be governed as a public utility by state commissions, as a broadcast service by the FCC, or under federal copyright laws. 

The Method: Analysis of Congressional hearings, reports from the House and Senate Communications subcommittees, FCC Reports and Orders, industry statements from the National Community Television Association (NCTA), and interviews with legislative staff and personnel. 

Quantitative Finding: CATV systems increased from 550 identifiable operations in 1959 to over 1,200 by the mid-1960s; 12 major systems served approximately 10% of all subscribers; between 1957 and 1963, television station gross earnings grew from $160.0 million to $343.2 million despite CATV expansion. 

Qualitative Finding: CATV is identified as a private business rather than a public utility because it does not provide essential "necessity" services; the FCC indirectly asserted jurisdiction by licensing microwave relay stations; the most feasible long-term solution is specific Congressional legislation to clarify and delegate federal authority over the industry. 

Publication Date

1-1966

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Faculty Sponsor

Archive

Download

Share

COinS