Student Scholarship
Document Type
Research Paper
Abstract
The 67th Congress served as a significant testing ground for the United States' relationship with the United Nations, specifically regarding the authorization of a 100 million dollar bond purchase to alleviate the organization's financial crisis. This crisis was primarily driven by the costs of peacekeeping operations in the Middle East and the Congo, exacerbated by the refusal of the Soviet bloc and other nations to pay their assessments. While the Kennedy administration viewed the bond issue as a vital foreign policy necessity, it faced alarming opposition from a coalition of legislators who questioned the future role of the United States within the international body.
Critics focused heavily on the United Nations Operations in the Congo, alleging military brutality, financial mismanagement, and Communist infiltration within the UN staff. High-profile investigations by Senator Thomas Dodd and Congressman Donald Bruce suggested that UN policy had shifted from non-intervention to active aggression against the pro-Western Katanga province, possibly influenced by Swedish and American mining interests. Furthermore, many members of Congress expressed concern over the shifting power dynamics in the General Assembly, where a growing number of small, newly independent nations held voting power disproportionate to their global responsibilities or financial contributions.
Opponents argued that purchasing the bonds would set a dangerous precedent, essentially bailing out delinquent nations and allowing the United Nations to dominate American national interests. Despite these intense debates and the introduction of several restrictive amendments, the bond bill eventually passed with bipartisan support, reflecting a cautious but continuing optimism in the United Nations as an instrument for world peace. The legislative struggle revealed a growing cynicism toward international bureaucracy and a demand for more realistic assessments of UN capabilities and limitations.
Research Highlights
-
The Problem: Alarming congressional opposition to the United Nations bond bill (S.2768) emerged despite historical bipartisan support, triggered by a UN financial crisis and its peacekeeping operations in the Congo.
-
The Method: Analysis of the legislative process, committee hearings, and specific arguments from the 87th Congress (1962) regarding the authorization of a $100 million loan to the United Nations.
-
Quantitative Finding: The UN faced a $94 million deficit in unpaid contributions by December 1961; the bond bill passed the Senate 70-22 and the House 256-134; 66 of 104 members were in arrears on Congo accounts.
-
Qualitative Finding: Opponents cited concerns over UN military "atrocities" in Katanga, potential Communist infiltration of UN staff, and the shifting of voting power to smaller nations in the General Assembly.
-
Finding: While the bill was a partisan Democratic victory, the intense opposition reflected a growing congressional desire to re-evaluate the United States' role as the primary financial supporter of the United Nations.
Publication Date
1-1963
Recommended Citation
Stockenberg, Mary Susan, "Opposition in Congress to the United Nations Bond Issue" (1963). Student Scholarship. 121.
https://digitalcommons.lindenwood.edu/student-research-papers/121
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Faculty Sponsor
Archive