Effect of Sleep Duration and Quality on External Workload in Women's Collegiate Lacrosse Athletes

Presenter Information

Paige Sutton, Lindenwood University

Start Date

9-4-2024 12:00 AM

Description

PURPOSE: Determine the relationship between self-reported sleep parameters and measures of external workload during training.

METHODS: Twenty NCAA DI women’s lacrosse athletes participated in this study. Athletes wore Polar Team Pro monitors during off-season training and completed a morning sleep questionnaire for four weeks. Workload was evaluated via total distance (TD), high-speed distance (HSR), rate of distance (rDIST, m/min), and relative high-speed distance (rHSR, %TD). Self-reported sleep duration (SD) was recorded in hours and sleep quality (SQ) on a 5-point scale. Linear regression analysis evaluated the relationship between sleep and workload measures while adjusting for training sessions. RESULTS: SD did not significantly predict TD (p = 0.467), HSR (p = 0.058), or rDIST (p = 0.117). However, SD had a significant relationship with rHSR (p = 0.012). SQ did not significantly predict TD (p = 0.963), HSR (p = 0.515), rDIST (p = 0.106), or rHSR (p = 0.412).

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
Apr 9th, 12:00 AM

Effect of Sleep Duration and Quality on External Workload in Women's Collegiate Lacrosse Athletes

PURPOSE: Determine the relationship between self-reported sleep parameters and measures of external workload during training.

METHODS: Twenty NCAA DI women’s lacrosse athletes participated in this study. Athletes wore Polar Team Pro monitors during off-season training and completed a morning sleep questionnaire for four weeks. Workload was evaluated via total distance (TD), high-speed distance (HSR), rate of distance (rDIST, m/min), and relative high-speed distance (rHSR, %TD). Self-reported sleep duration (SD) was recorded in hours and sleep quality (SQ) on a 5-point scale. Linear regression analysis evaluated the relationship between sleep and workload measures while adjusting for training sessions. RESULTS: SD did not significantly predict TD (p = 0.467), HSR (p = 0.058), or rDIST (p = 0.117). However, SD had a significant relationship with rHSR (p = 0.012). SQ did not significantly predict TD (p = 0.963), HSR (p = 0.515), rDIST (p = 0.106), or rHSR (p = 0.412).